CATER’s Comrade Cory Briggs Loses Again

Cory Briggs – the left-wing San  Diego litigator who works with local gadfly group CATER to fling monkey wrenches into economic development initiatives – has suffered another court room loss. At least, a tentative loss. The OTMD is funded by self-assessing hotels and promotes business and leisure travel in Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga.

Brigg’s front group, the Inland Oversight Committee (IOC), is suing the City of Ontario; Briggs/IOC  claim the formation of the Ontario Tourism Marketing District (OTMD) is actually a tax and not what it is – a self-assessment by participating businesses – and must therefore be put to a vote of the people.

This news alert from Civitas Advisors provides more details:

Court Issues Favorable Tentative Ruling in Ontario TMD Case

The California Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division Two) issued a tentative ruling in favor of the City and the TMD in the case of the Inland Oversight Committee vs. City of Ontario. It is important to note that the ruling is tentative, the Court invited oral arguments, and the ruling could be subject to change after oral arguments.

The Plaintiff in this case, the Inland Oversight Committee (IOC) challenged formation of the Ontario Tourism Marketing District (TMD), claiming that the TMD assessment is actually a tax subject to approval of the cities’ voters rather than an assessment subject to approval by the hotel payors. If the Plaintiff were to be successful, it could mean that future TMD formation and renewals would need to be approved by a vote of the electorate, rather than the payor hotels.

The Plaintiff’s claim revolves around the meaning of a portion of Article XIIIC of the California Constitution, Proposition 26. Prop 26 states that every levy by a local government is a tax that must be approved by the voters – unless it qualifies for at least one of seven exceptions. The two exceptions pertinent to TMDs are levies that provide a “specific benefit” or a “specific government service.” Unfortunately, neither of these exceptions were clearly defined in Prop 26. To create clarity around these terms, in 2013 a coalition of TMDs, CalTravel, and Civitas joined forces to work with the Legislature to draft and secure adoption of AB483, which further defined the terms “specific benefit” and “specific government service.”

The Court considered both Prop 26 and AB483. The tentative ruling states that, “the assessments are not ‘taxes’ within the meaning of article XIIIC” because they provide specific benefits and specific government services and “fall under the first and second exceptions to the definition of ‘tax’ in article XIIIC.”

In its reasoning, the Court noted that “The Legislature’s findings and declarations in enacting Assembly Bill No. 483 lend further support to our interpretation of article XIIIC as excluding District Law assessments on businesses from definition of a ‘tax’.”

Although it isn’t final yet, this well-reasoned positive ruling starts to reduce the threat posed by Prop 26. Big thanks to CalTravel, and all of the bureaus and TMDs around the state who made AB483 possible! Together, our efforts will make a difference and protect TMDs for years to come.

This is noteworthy not only because CATER ally Cory Briggs has encountered another legal defeat. Anaheim has its own counterpart to the OTMD: the Anaheim Tourism Improvement District (ATID), which markets the Anaheim Resort and will also underwrite the operation of the proposed Anaheim Rapid Connection system. If Briggs manages to turn things around and win the Ontario case, it’s possible the CATER wrecking crew will team with him again and go after the ATID in order to submarine ARC.

4 comments

  1. I thought ARC was submarined by the Feds.

    Are there people who still want to build it?

  2. Ryan, I thought ARC was submarined by the Feds AND the actions of Natalie Meeks who admitted in an email (turned over to Council Tuesday night) that she cooked the books on ridership, which also had the side benefit of artificially inflating the numbers on ARTIC, which was designed to work had in hand with the streetcar. And hey, once you have told the Feds you claimed tens of thousands of riders per day in a bid for big public funding, you can’t really back off and tell prospective tenants you BS’ed your way through the Federal grant application and those riders don’t REALLY exist, so now you face fraudulently misrepresenting a material fact regarding a public facility you are trying to draw private funding in support of a black hole in the budget. I’m thinking an angry restauranteur furious about going broke on Natalie Meeks’ ego is going to put a big stop to this nonsense pretty soon, and frankly I think the hoteliers themselves will eventually pull the plug on money they are forced to extract from their own guests being used for projects that do NOT benefit them. (it is especially insulting that at least two hoteliers are being forced to demand the 2% payment from their guests while knowing it will ultimately be used to create their own demise.) And sooner or later I think some of those hoteliers are going to buck the system against Disney gaming things to ensure THEY don’t have to collect money from the same guests the hoteliers do, for projects that benefit Disney above all other Resort businesses. Yes I know there wouldn’t be a Resort without Disney I also know Disney is not going anywhere, the environment is much changed from 1996, and those hoteliers have far more power as a block if they use it wisely.

    But hey matt, thanks for taking a WAG at something my group has NEVER threatened to tackle, and thanks for tying us to absolutely every move Briggs makes, short of his morning trip to the loo (and you would tie us to that if you could.) Especially coming from someone who then snarks about conspiracy theories and non-existent connections that are FAR FAR more connected than CATER’s short-term partnership with Cory. You need a hobby beyond merely carping at a community group seeking nothing more than access to open and fair government.

    • A short term partnership between Briggs and CATER?

      Seems as soon as Briggs starts losing CATER starts its distancing campaign.

      That’s cold blooded.

  3. No jack, two groups found common ground for a short period. That does not mean that I personally, nor CATER as an organization, have knowledge of or endorse everything Briggs has ever or will ever do, yet this blog loves to connect us, and while I don’t mind it I do find it odd. Do we not understand the concept of hired help? And if we are rolling with the idea that once any business transaction of any kind is conducted, those individuals and organizations are forever linked, then I dnt want to her any whining when we say the “chamber funded” Cunningham blog, or the “Pringle ring” ….you don’t mind do you?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


Skip to toolbar