BREAKING: Court Rules In Favor of Palm Lane Parents; Calls ACSD Behavior “Unfair, Unreasonable, Arbitrary and Capricious”

school_PalmLaneModernization

In a victory for parents over an obstructionist school district, OC Superior Court Judge Andrew Banks ruled in favor of the parents group that has been battling a hostile Anaheim City School District to press their right to convert Palm Lane Elementary School into an independent charter school. The parents were acting pursuant to their rights under the state Parent Trigger Law.  Their champion, former state Sen. Gloria Romero, detailed several examples of the lengths to which the school district (abetted by the school employee unions) to frustrate and undermine the efforts of these parents. The ACSD leadership should be deeply embarrassed, considering the law requires them to be a neutral party, not a partisan actor.

Thanks for Judge Banks ruling, the Palm Lane parents win and the conversion of Palm Lane Elementary to charter status can move forward.

Here is the press release:

Court Upholds Parents Palm Lane Elementary Parent Trigger Petition

Anaheim, California – THURSDAY, July 16, 2015, today, Judge Andrew Banks of the Anaheim Superior Court issued his ruling rejecting and reversing the Anaheim School District’s denial of the Parent Trigger Petition submitted by Palm Lane Elementary parents seeking to transform their Anaheim, California school. Judge Banks’ ruling also denied the Anaheim School District’s request to uphold the Anaheim School Board’s findings that Palm Lane Elementary is not a subject school under the Parent Empowerment Act, and found that the parents’ petition substantially complied with various requirements under the Parent Empowerment Act.

In issuing his ruling, Judge Banks not only upheld the validity of the petition, but found the Anaheim School District’s rejection of the petition to be among other things, “procedurally unfair, unreasonable, arbitrary and capricious.”  Specifically, Judge Banks’ ruling found: 

(i) “The evidence clearly establishes that Palm Lane failed to make adequate yearly progress. I therefore find that Palm Lane is a subject school under the Act.”

(ii) The evidence reflects that contrary to the District’s claims, that lead petitioners were identified as required under the Act. “After considering all the evidence, I resolve this issue in favor of the Petitioners.”

(iii) That the petition complied with 5 CCR §4804 and the Restart Model, finding “the evidence convinces the Court that the necessary and required information was provided.”

(iv)  That the petition contained more than the required 50% threshold of valid parent signatures. In commenting on the District’s validation process, Judge Banks stated:  “I find the process set up and utilized by the Respondents was unreasonable, unfair and incomplete.”  

In issuing his Order, Judge Banks ordered the Anaheim School District and the Anaheim City School District Board of Education to:

  1. Within 20 calendar days of the date the Writ is signed, rescind the February 19, 2015, action of the Anaheim City School District Board of Education that rejected the Parent Trigger Petition;
  1. Within the same 20 calendar days, accept the Parent Trigger Petition submitted on January 14, 2015; and
  2. Allow Petitioners to immediately begin the process of soliciting and selecting charter school proposals.

Judge Bank’s Order is attached.  

Celilia Ochoa, one of the lead petitioners commented, “In speaking for all the Palm Lane Elementary parents, we are grateful for Judge Banks ruling and his support of our efforts for our children to receive the basic education they are entitled to and deserve.”

Former Senator Gloria Romero head of the California Center for Parent Empowerment and author of the Parent Trigger law, stated: “Today justice prevailed in a court of law.  The District tried to spin a fantasy to invalidate the petition and used obstructionist tactics.  The judge clearly ruled in favor of the parents. Tomorrow begins another day in the life of these children. For these parents and their children, dreams do come true.”  

Mark Holscher, pro bono attorney for Kirkland & Ellis, commented “We appreciate the care and consideration Judge Banks gave the parents in this case. This ruling impacts all schools that have been designated a failing school by California Board of Education and continues to pave the way for parents across California to secure their fundamental right to a quality education for their children.” 

Kirkland & Ellis LLP (www.kirkland.com) is a 1,600-attorney law firm representing global clients in complex corporate, restructuring and tax, litigation and dispute resolution/arbitration, and intellectual property and technology matters. The Firm has offices in Chicago, Beijing, Hong Kong, Houston, London, Los Angeles, Munich, New York, Palo Alto, San Francisco, Shanghai and Washington, D.C.

It should be noted that Anaheim Councilwoman Kris Murray and Mayor Pro Tem Lucille Kring have been staunch and outspoken supporters of these parents as they took on the educracy to take control of their school on behalf of their children. [These are the same working-class parents that local blogger Vern Nelson, self-styled progressive and people’s tribune, denigrated as a “pitchfork-wielding mob.”]

The Lincoln Club of Orange County should also be singled out for praise for their staunch support for the efforts of these parents to stand up to the bureaucracy and unions and exercise their rights.

Former ACSD Board member and council aspirant Jose F. Moreno has stridently denounced charter schools as instruments of corporate greed. Questions: who is really more in touch with the needs and aspirations of ordinary Anaheim residents, rather than entrenched special interests?

4 comments

  1. One thing we’ve learned from this issue is Tom Tait prizes his bromance with Jose Moreno above his principles. The old Tom Tait wouldn’t have hesitated to support the Palm Lane parents. The new Tom Tait asks the Lincoln Club to back off supporting the Palm Lane parents because he was afraid it would hurt Moreno’s council campaign. Tait only voted for Lucille Kring’s resolution on the Palm Lane parent trigger application because it was watered down to the point where he could say publicly he wasn’t voting to support the parents, and it took intense Lincoln Club lobbying to get him to do that.

  2. So in short, Tait asked the Lincoln Club to stop trying to help children get a good education because his liberal friend wants an elected office. Getting that liberal friend into power is more important to him than the best interest of these kids…

    Incredible.

  3. There’s an Anaheim Superior Court?

  4. Parent Opinion News

    I like that the caring parents gained the power and tenacity to hang in there and start a charter school. Some charters good some bad, so, I hope a good charter school is created. School districts can be, in perhaps most circumstances, arrogant in how they and high level school administers and often school board members, can not honor parent voice.

    Now, July, 2015, the C.D.E. is getting rid of the open enrollment act, so, no scores, no accountability for anyone, and it looks like the State Board of Education will discontinue high school exit exams, so, I predict our California, my California, will experience a decline of the value of high school diplomas, and, low income children and parents will be uninformed as to the quality of the public school their child attends in the next 8 years.

    Only hope is for parent teaching of children with math and parent checking with testing to help academically teach their children properly.

    In my opinion the California Department of Education and The State Boardbof Education, And Mr. Torlakson and Governor Brown have got the kids wrapped up in an educational experiment gone bad.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


Skip to toolbar