Common Core: Another Stairway to Nowhere

The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (1965) signed by President Lyndon Johnson was revised seven times, most recently by President George Bush when he approved No Child Left Behind (NCLB, 2002). The effect on student performance of NCLB was near zero, so the Obama administration created a new program, Race to the Top, excusing states from fulfilling the goals of NCLB if they agreed to adopt Common Core: assumed educational standards or instructional goals in English and mathematics for all students in all grades. Nevertheless, it is asserted that Common Core is not a national curriculum (Common Core State Standards, 2014a).

StairsTo date, 43 states, including California, have adopted Common Core for use in public schools. It is just as likely, however, that its effect will the same as previously adopted educational programs supported by the federal government to increase student achievement: zero effect.

Despite the spending of billions of dollars by the federal and state governments, reading and math scores of students aged 9, 13, and 17 years on measures such as the National Assessment of Education Progress (2013) have remained almost unchanged for more than 40 years. This figure shows reading scores (1971-2012)—although math scores during the same period are almost a mirror image:

Reading

Common Core is intended “to help prepare students for college, career, and life [by identifying] what students are expected to learn at each grade” (Common Core State Standards, 2014c). It is purportedly evidence-based, reality-based, and research-based. Absent, however, is ongoing research or any review of the outcomes of Common Core—a basic principle of any real research-based activity.

Common Core expects students to read “classic myths and stories from around the world, America’s founding documents, foundational American literature, and Shakespeare” (Common Core State Standards, 2014b). Yet it is asserted that Common Core lacks a required reading list (Common Core State Standards, 2014b).

In fact, Common Core is the latest form of edubabble for which California has approved spending more than $1,200,000,000 to implement for training teachers and buying instructional materials and technologies. Not surprising is that no substantive evidence has been presented that establishing standards for young children leads to later success. Moreover, a fundamental assumption of Common Core is severely flawed: Not every person should attend, or graduate from, college. A college degree does not ensure success as an adult any more than the absence of a college degree ensures failure.

Eight Presidents and many renowned writers were not college graduates. Consider these remarkable successes in a wide range of fields that include billionaires who lacked a college degree or never attended college: Woody Allen, Julie Andrews, Maya Angelou, Kay Ash, Carl Bernstein, Halle Berry, James Cameron, Andrew Carnegie, Coco Chanel, Winston Churchill, Walt Disney, Debbi FIelds, Robert Frost, George Gershwin, Bill Gates, John Glenn, Joyce Hall, Derek Jeter, Steve Jobs, Ralph Lauren, Abraham Lincoln, Charles Lindbergh, Susan Lyne, Pablo Picasso, Rachel Ray, John D. Rockefeller, George Romney, William Safire, William Shakespeare, Russell Simmons, Hilary Swank, Ted Turner, George Washington, Oprah Winfrey, Steve Wozniak, and Mark Zuckerberg. And there are hundreds more examples of highly successful noncollege graduates.

Educational historian and researcher Diane Ravitch (2014) concluded: Common Core will be “the money pit that consumed American education. The sooner it dies, the sooner schools and teachers will be freed of the Giant Federal Accountability Plan hatched in secret and foisted upon our nation’s schools.”

The bad news: Common Core is another stairway to nowhere—a very costly stairway that will do nothing to improve educational outcomes in our nation’s public schools. But even worse news: As soon as Common Core dies, government will likely establish another ineffective educational activity or program that will cost taxpayers billions more.

—Hugh Glenn

References

Common Core State Standards Initiative (2014a). Frequently asked questions. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/l5q63q5

Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2014b). Myths vs. facts. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/3oz7cpq

Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2014c). Read the standards. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/p9zfnwo

Elementary and Secondary School Act. Public Law 89-10 (April 11, 1965)

National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). The nation’s report card: Trends in academic progress. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/oczx9p2

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (2002). Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425

Ravitch, D. (2014, September 2). Re: Good riddance to common core testing. [Web log message]. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/opo2yjj

One comment

  1. I couldn’t agree with you more! As a parent who loathes common core, I’m forced to fork out thousands of dollars for private school. So as a taxpayer, I am paying for public school that uses a program I disapprove of AND a private school as well.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Skip to toolbar